Allergan has introduced a Skin Quality Index: a list of standardized terms and definitions that helps doctors discuss skin quality more systematically, from consultation to treatment choice and evaluation. That is very useful for both doctor and patient in the consultation room, especially now that, alongside fillers and botulinum toxin, more and more treatments aimed at improving skin condition are being offered. The more knowledge about the skin is shared, the better. Still, for me, it does raise some questions…
Fast read
- Allergan has created a Skin Quality Index: a set of standard words to describe skin quality in the consultation room.
- This new language is meant to help doctors and patients talk more clearly about issues such as redness, texture, hydration and firmness.
- The index arrives at a time when aesthetic clinics are broadening their offerings, because fillers and botulinum toxin are no longer the answer to everything.
- New treatments such as skin boosters, biostimulators, polynucleotides, exosomes and laser treatments tend to work more gradually, which means they require more explanation and more patience.
- What stands out is that this kind of systematic skin analysis has long been standard practice in the salon world, among estheticians and skin therapists, and also among cosmetic manufacturers.
When I launched BeautyJournaal back in 2009, the renowned cosmetic chemist Johan Wiechers taught me something I have never forgotten: beauty—especially skincare—is largely sold through language. Words shape how we understand results. Language sets expectations. It gives meaning to a product or treatment.That thought came back to me when I saw Allergan’s new Skin Quality Index.
lees ook
A structured way to describe skin condition
At first glance, the system Allergan introduced (and shared via the American magazine NewBeauty) looks quite simple. Their premise is this: doctors and patients often use different words to describe the same skin concerns.
A patient might say their skin looks dull, saggy, uneven or tired. A doctor will think in terms of redness, pigmentation, texture, hydration or elasticity. According to Allergan, this gap in language can lead to confusion. So they created a standardized set of terms to describe skin quality more clearly. To get here they reviewed more than 900 scientific publications from the last 20 years. Online surveys of over 200 aesthetic providers and over 1000 patients were utilized to assess if the terminology was impacted by provider expertise or conversational partner, the patient, according to NewBeauty.
The problem is not that we lack knowledge about skin quality, but that we don’t speak the same language about it.
Built on research, experience and perception
Allergan explains that the index is based on scientific literature, clinical experience and patient perception. The scientific foundation was also published in the journal Dermatologic Surgery.
The key takeaway from that research is surprisingly simple: in aesthetic medicine, many skin quality terms are still used inconsistently. Not everyone means the same thing when they talk about dullness, dryness or firmness. That makes it harder to compare treatments, explain results and make clear decisions. And that is exactly why Allergan now wants to introduce a shared vocabulary.
lees ook
Color, texture, hydration and firmness
The index divides skin quality into four main categories.
First: color—things like redness, pigmentation and uneven tone.
Second: texture—pores, roughness and smoothness.
Third: hydration and oil balance—is the skin dry, oily or out of balance?
Fourth: mechanics—how firm, elastic or lax the skin appears.
The more precisely you describe what you see, the easier it becomes to talk about what is happening in the skin. That is not new. Skin therapists and estheticians have been working this way for years, often supported by advanced skin analysis devices.
From fillers to skin quality
So why is Allergan doing this now? Because the market is changing. Aesthetic medicine used to focus heavily on correction, with fast-acting solutions to soften a wrinkle or restore volume. But the limits of that approach are becoming more visible.
As tissue ages, fat compartments shift and skin structure declines, not everything can be solved with muscle relaxation or volume alone. Hyaluronic acid fillers are not a lifelong solution either. Many doctors now openly acknowledge that incorrect placement, superficial injections or overuse can eventually lead to unnatural results due to product accumulation.
This does not mean injectables are disappearing. On the contrary. Highly skilled and experienced doctors emphasize that fillers still play an important role in restoring structure and support—if applied with deep anatomical knowledge and at the correct depth. But the era of “just add a bit and fix it” is clearly behind us.
There is a vast amount of research on skin, but as long as different terms and definitions are used, comparison and explanation remain difficult.
A changing patient demand
At the same time, patient expectations have shifted. Where people once focused on a single wrinkle or volume loss, they now talk about the overall look of their skin. It feels less fresh. Less even. Less firm. Less radiant. That is not a classic filler question. That is a skin quality question.
The beauty industry has been moving in this direction for years, focusing on glow, even tone and overall skin health. What used to be broad categories like dry, oily or sensitive skin has evolved into a much more detailed understanding of specific skin concerns.
The rise of regenerative treatments
As injectables are no longer the only answer, clinics are expanding their offerings. We are seeing a growing number of treatments aimed at improving the skin itself.
Think of skin boosters and biostimulators such as Radiesse, but also newer approaches like polynucleotides and exosomes. Laser treatments are also making a strong comeback. These treatments are not about instantly filling or freezing, but about improving hydration, firmness, texture and overall skin quality.
They are promising developments—but they require something different from both doctor and patient: patience. Unlike hyaluronic acid fillers or botulinum toxin, these treatments do not deliver immediate, visible results. The skin needs time to respond and improve. That makes them less spectacular in the short term, but potentially more meaningful in the long run.
Making improvement visible
This is where the Skin Quality Index becomes useful. It gives doctors a framework to describe subtle changes in the skin. Not just as a general feeling, but as part of a structured assessment. Dullness becomes a category. Redness becomes a parameter. Elasticity becomes something you can discuss and track.
Instead of saying “your skin looks better,” you can say: redness has decreased, texture has improved, hydration has increased. That creates clarity in a process where results are not always immediately visible to the naked eye.
Allergan isn’t creating new knowlegde here, it’s trying to bring structure to how existing knowledge is described in practice.
A familiar approach for skin professionals
And this is where it becomes interesting—and perhaps slightly uncomfortable. Because this way of reading and interpreting the skin is not new. In the world of estheticians and skin therapists, it has been standard practice for years. They are trained to assess hydration levels, oil production, pore structure and sensitivity. Many clinics already use advanced diagnostic tools and imaging systems, backed by huge datasets.
What used to belong to the domain of skincare and skin therapy is now becoming more embedded in medical aesthetics. The skin is no longer only analyzed to improve care, but also to build treatment strategies, define outcomes and manage expectations.
Language doesn’t just describe—it directs
Language does not only describe reality—it shapes it. The way you define a skin concern influences what is seen as the logical solution. When skin quality is broken down into clear domains and parameters, it becomes easier to connect specific treatments to those categories.
And that matters. Because skin quality is taking on a bigger role in aesthetic practice. Clinics are broadening their services. Treatments are becoming more subtle, more gradual—and they require more explanation. Results unfold over time, which means understanding becomes just as important as the outcome itself.
A broader awareness
Personally, I believe that this growing conversation around skin biology and skin quality—across different disciplines—can only benefit consumers. It raises awareness about how we care for our skin. And that is much needed. We need to learn to treat our skin more thoughtfully—as a living organ, not just a surface.
